Q&A · ESMA
Integration of sustainability within the MiFID II product governance requirements
In a Commission answer, firms setting the negative target market for a product that does not consider sustainability factors must also consider any clients' sustainability-related objectives the product is incompatible with, though depending on the product this may result in no negative target market for that criterion.
Details
| Reference | ESMA_QA_1966 |
|---|---|
| Issuer | ESMA |
| Published | 2 Oct 2023 |
| Answered | 2 Oct 2023 |
| Submitted | 2 Oct 2023 |
| ESMA topics | Product governance |
Provisions it relates to
- Article 16 MiFID II · Organisational requirementsInferred · 80%
- Article 24 MiFID II · General principles and information to clientsInferred · 75%
- MiFID II (whole act)Explicit reference
Documents it refers to
- Delegated actIn forceExplicit reference
AI summaryThe MiFID II Delegated Directive on safeguarding client financial instruments and funds (deposits, use of client assets, title transfer collateral, a single officer responsible, auditor reports), product governance duties for manufacturers and distributors, and inducements, including rules for independent advice, portfolio management and research. Since amended, including by Delegated Directives 2021/1269 (sustainability) and 2026/374 (research payment).
- GuidelinesPublishedExplicit reference
AI summaryESMA's original guidelines (ESMA35-43-620), applying from 3 January 2018, on the product governance obligations in Articles 16(3) and 24(2) MiFID II: how manufacturers identify a target market and distribution strategy, how distributors refine and review them, and issues common to both, with illustrative examples. ESMA has since issued revised guidelines.