Q&A · ESMA
Direct Electronic Access (DEA) and algorithmic trading
Orders should be flagged as part of a market making strategy under RTS 24 (and RTS 6) only once the firm has concluded a market making agreement with the venue, since the flag distinguishes agreed market making from the firm's discretionary order flow.
Details
| Reference | ESMA_QA_1613 |
|---|---|
| Issuer | ESMA |
| Published | 7 Jul 2017 |
| Answered | 7 Jul 2017 |
| Submitted | 7 Jul 2017 |
| ESMA topics | Direct Electronic Access and algorithmic trading |
| Earlier Q&A document | ESMA 70-872942901-38 MiFID II MiFIR market structures Q&A, Q&A 3.17 |
Provisions it relates to
- Article 17 MiFID II · Algorithmic tradingInferred · 85%
- MiFIR (whole act)Explicit reference
Documents it refers to
- RTSIn forceExplicit reference · 90%
AI summaryRTS 24 setting the content, standards and format of order data that trading venue operators must keep for at least five years and provide to competent authorities on request under Article 25(2) MiFIR, including party identification, trading capacity, timestamps, order events, types, prices and instructions, and auction data.
- RTSIn forceExplicit reference · 90%
AI summaryRTS 8 on market making: specifies when algorithmic traders pursuing a market making strategy must sign a market making agreement with a trading venue, the agreement's minimum content and the exceptional circumstances that suspend obligations, and requires venues to run fair and non-discriminatory market making schemes for specified liquid instruments.