Q&A · ESMA

Best Execution

Answered

Read the official text on the ESMA website(opens in a new tab)

AI-generated Summary

Under RTS 28 Article 3(3), firms must give a separate summary of their execution-quality analysis for each class of financial instrument, though information common to several classes (close links, conflicts, payments and rebates from venues) may be given once on a consolidated basis.

Details

Reference	ESMA_QA_1041
Issuer	ESMA
Published	16 Dec 2016
Answered	16 Dec 2016
Submitted	16 Dec 2016
ESMA topics	Best Execution
Earlier Q&A document	ESMA35-43-349 MiFIDII Investor protection Best execution 10

Provisions it relates to

Article 27 MiFID II · Obligation to execute orders on terms most favourable to the client
MiFID II
Inferred · 80%
MiFIR (whole act)
Explicit reference

Documents it refers to

RTSEnds 11 Aug 2028Explicit reference · 90%
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/576 of 8 June 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the annual publication by investment firms of information on the identity of execution venues and on the quality of execution
European Commission · 31 Mar 2017 · EUR-Lex
AI summaryRTS 28 requiring investment firms to publish annually, for each class of financial instruments, their top five execution venues by trading volume for client orders, with a summary of the execution quality obtained. Repealed by Delegated Regulation 2026/825; valid until 11 August 2028.